18, జూన్ 2013, మంగళవారం
20, మే 2013, సోమవారం
Canada Immigration is now open!
- FromY-Axis Tod_ramu2002@yahoo.com
Dear Client,
Canada
Skilled Immigration also known as Canada Federal Skilled Worker Program
has announced the new occupation list with a limited CAP. There is an overall cap of only 5000 new applications and a cap of 300 per occupation.
24 Occupations that are eligible to apply with limited CAP
· IT -
Computer Engineer, Systems Engineer, Telecommunication specialists,
Network Engineer, Computer Application Programmer, Developer, Mainframe,
Game Developer, Multimedia, Animation and many more;
Engineers – Civil, Mechanical, Chemical, Mining, Petroleum, Aerospace and more;
Physiotherapists;
Occupational Therapists;
Financial & Banking Professionals, investment Analysts, Portfolio Manager, Research associate, Financial services;
CAs;
Medical Technicians;
And many more..
For more information on applying for Canada immigration & your eligibility, please speak to your Consultant today.
Regards
Y-Axis Customer Service
Email: customerservice@y-axis.com
Tel: 040 30589725 / 726 / 727
SMS : NRI to 57333
Our Offices: http://www.y-axis.com/ContactUs.aspx
Email: customerservice@y-axis.com
Tel: 040 30589725 / 726 / 727
SMS : NRI to 57333
Our Offices: http://www.y-axis.com/ContactUs.aspx
--
If you do not wish to receive any further communications, please Click Here
13, మే 2013, సోమవారం
Java enterprise edition (JEE) for software development industry oriented course
1. Course Number:
MSC..number
2. Course Title Java enterprise edition (JEE)
3. Credit Hours: 4
4. Contact Hours:
Lecture
Hours: 4
Lab Hours: 3
5. Suggested Prerequisites:
Object Oriented
Programming
6. course objective
Java Enterprise
Edition(JEE )
Objective: The objective of this course is to provide the student with
an expertise in Java Programming. This includes both the Core Java programming.
After successful completion of the course, the student should be able to
develop, design and maintain web-based enterprise applications effectively.
Computer software, reviews the basic
features and trends in the major types of application software and system
software used to support enterprise and end...
7.Exit Profile: After Completion of this Course, You can start working as
Programmer or software developer or webdesiginer in Java Enterprises Edition.
For M.Sc students in IT ,
8. Course Content:
|
|
1. Introduction
Java Enterprise Edition
Integrated Application
Development
Web Server or Application
Server
EJB 3 Basics
Projects in Java EE
EJB Security
EJB Deployment
2. Transactions
Need for transactions
Transaction Components
Distributed transactions
Java transactions API
3. Java Beans
EJB Development Overview
The Enterprise Bean Class
Enterprise JavaBeans
Communications
Session beans
Stateless beans
Message driven beans
The Remote Interface
The Home Interface
Deployment Descriptors and
EJB-JAR files
4. Entities and Persistence
Persistence
Entities v session beans
EJB Query Language
Entity relationships
Entity inheritance
5. Design Patterns
EJB Design Patterns
Case studies
6. Writing an EJB Client
Detailed guide
7. Java Message Service
(JMS)
The principles of messaging
systems
Features of the Java
Messaging Service (JMS)
|
|
Writing a message driven Bean
Message Driven Bean Clients
8. Web Services in Java
XML in Java
What are web services
Java Architecture for XML
Binding (JAXB)
Soap protocol
WSDL (web service definition
language)
UDDI (Universal Description
Discovery and Integration)
Java API for XML Web
Services (JAXWS)
|
9.Evaluation
Quiz 1: 10%
Quiz 2: 10%
Assignment 5%
Attendance &
Class Participation 5%
Lab 20%
Final
Examination: 50%
10.Attendance Policy: students are expected to
attend all class meeting and it is the student’s responsibility to make up any
work missed.
11.Text Book
Enterprise JavaBeans, Fourth Edition: Richard Monson-Haefel, Bill ...
Enterprise JavaBeans 3.1: Andrew Lee Rubinger, Bill Burke ...
12.References
Java
Servlet Programming, by Jason Hunter with William Crawford
Developing Java Servlets, by James Goodwill
Enterprise JavaBeans 3.1, 6th Edition - O'Reilly Media
Enterprise JavaBeans 3.1: Amazon.ca: Andrew Lee Rubinger, Bill ...
Enterprise JavaBeans For Dummies: Amazon.ca: Mac Rinehart: Books
13)· When
to use EJB?
I know it is a bad question, but if
my application use only stateless and statefull session bean. Do I still need
to use EJB and app. server, instead of using servlet with Tomcat??
Why EJB is more scaleable and cluster friendly? Someone said if I want a 24/7 server (which I do), I need to use an app. server. Is it true?
If I use Tomcat, I can still cluster it and failover etc..., what is the true benifit of using app server than just web container?
any help will be appreciated
Regards
Why EJB is more scaleable and cluster friendly? Someone said if I want a 24/7 server (which I do), I need to use an app. server. Is it true?
If I use Tomcat, I can still cluster it and failover etc..., what is the true benifit of using app server than just web container?
any help will be appreciated
Regards
You don't need EJB if you're only
developing a web client.
really? if I want to support pda,
mobile phone etc... do I need to use EJB?
Still you don't need EJB
When one uses EJB, the application
becomes multi-tired. Because of this presentation and business logics are
separated. Besides, for huge applications, one can rely on the services like
security, transaction and persistance provided by application servers. The
developer needs to concentrate on the implementation of business logic.
Some time back, I read an article by
Ed Roman on the same subject. I think it is available in the archives of
theserverside.com. The key points from that article and some other places are
given below:
The definition of EJB states that it is a distributed, transactional, persistent software component written in Java Programming Language. From this definition, it can be derived that EJBs are required in the following scenarios.
i. When the application is distributed: When the resources and data are distributed across multiple sites, then it is ideal to go for an application that is based on EJBs. Choose EJB when you know your application will need to scale beyond initial low usage levels and support multiple, concurrent users.
ii. When the application is performance-centric, use of EJBs and the application server provide high performance and very good scalability.
iii. Declaratively manage transactions. When transaction management is required to ensure data integrity, EJBs may be used. In EJB, you merely specify whether a bean's methods require, disallow, or can be used in the context of a transaction. The EJB container will manage your transaction boundaries appropriately. In a purely servlet architecture, you'll have to write code to manage the transaction, which is difficult if a logical transaction must access multiple DataSources.
iv. Declaratively manage security. The EJB model allows you to indicate a security role that the user must be assigned to in order to invoke a method on a bean.
v. Separation of Business Logic. The most significant difference between a web application using only servlets and one using servlets with EJBs is that the EJB model mandates a separation between display and business logic. This can be achieved using Servlets and DAO also
Hope it helps.
The definition of EJB states that it is a distributed, transactional, persistent software component written in Java Programming Language. From this definition, it can be derived that EJBs are required in the following scenarios.
i. When the application is distributed: When the resources and data are distributed across multiple sites, then it is ideal to go for an application that is based on EJBs. Choose EJB when you know your application will need to scale beyond initial low usage levels and support multiple, concurrent users.
ii. When the application is performance-centric, use of EJBs and the application server provide high performance and very good scalability.
iii. Declaratively manage transactions. When transaction management is required to ensure data integrity, EJBs may be used. In EJB, you merely specify whether a bean's methods require, disallow, or can be used in the context of a transaction. The EJB container will manage your transaction boundaries appropriately. In a purely servlet architecture, you'll have to write code to manage the transaction, which is difficult if a logical transaction must access multiple DataSources.
iv. Declaratively manage security. The EJB model allows you to indicate a security role that the user must be assigned to in order to invoke a method on a bean.
v. Separation of Business Logic. The most significant difference between a web application using only servlets and one using servlets with EJBs is that the EJB model mandates a separation between display and business logic. This can be achieved using Servlets and DAO also
Hope it helps.
Hi,
I have my points and questions :
When the application is distributed:
What does it really mean a distributed application ? Does it mean multiple users use one application connecting to a multiple database spread across network or something else ?
When the application is performance-centric
I think performance-centric has nothing to do with EJB.
Declaratively manage transactions
Hibernate and XA can do this as well.
Declaratively manage security
I agree at this point.
Separation of Business Logic
Spring + Hibernate + Struts do that as well.
This can be achieved using Servlets and DAO also
So, I think the only thing you use EJB is only when you have a security feature. Other than that, Hibernate is a good alternative to use.
Ben.
I have my points and questions :
When the application is distributed:
What does it really mean a distributed application ? Does it mean multiple users use one application connecting to a multiple database spread across network or something else ?
When the application is performance-centric
I think performance-centric has nothing to do with EJB.
Declaratively manage transactions
Hibernate and XA can do this as well.
Declaratively manage security
I agree at this point.
Separation of Business Logic
Spring + Hibernate + Struts do that as well.
This can be achieved using Servlets and DAO also
So, I think the only thing you use EJB is only when you have a security feature. Other than that, Hibernate is a good alternative to use.
Ben.
Hi,I have my points and questions :When the application
is distributed: What does it really mean a distributed application?
That the application consists of
multiple (physical) components. And note that database is not part of the
application.
When the application is
performance-centricI think performance-centric has
nothing to do with EJB.
EJB (when correctly applied) make
your application scalable, as they can be clustered. Of course you can achieve
scalability by clustering whole application and load-balance incoimng client
requests (e.g. HTTP) instead of intermediate, intra-application requests (e.g.
RMI/IIOP). Also EJB are thread-safe so it's rather trivial to avoid any
contentions due to locking in the application.
Another thing EJB have with performance is that they can greatly increase latency due to overhead, if their use is too fine-grained or if the app server sucks...
Another thing EJB have with performance is that they can greatly increase latency due to overhead, if their use is too fine-grained or if the app server sucks...
Declaratively manage transactionsHibernate and XA can do this as well.
Actually, Spring (Spring AOP to be
exact) can. With Hibernate and XA you can do it only programmatically.
Declaratively manage securityI agree at this point.
Again, this could be done with
Spring AOP. But as far as I know there are no pre-made "aspects".
To me this thread shows exactly what
is wrong with our profession. Too many people read the marketing literature and
take it as gospel.
You use EJB when and only when you need the container services. That is, transaction, persistence and security. Now if you follow the advice of most and don't use Entity beans that leaves you with security and transaction. Very few people use the security features on EJB so that leaves you with transactions. There are many other often easier ways to deal with transactions though so it is still questionable if you ever need EJB.
Let us examine some of the comments made so far.
1. Scalability - Why is it more scalable? If you are using Stateless session beans you are scalable because you are stateless. But if you are stateless it is just as easy to use POJOs (Plain old Java Objects) . Stateless design leads to better scalability but EJBs are not necessary to make your application stateless. Again the only advantage is the container services provides - otherwise it is just code folks - and your code will work just fine.
While we are at it lets address another common misconception. Lifecycle management. It is often claimed that EJB gives you some necessary lifecycle management and object pooling. It also is supposed to help you in a multi threaded environment. The trouble with this claim is that if you are stateless there are no threading issues and you only need one instance to handle all of your clients on a server. Servlets and stateless Session beans are essentially equivalent ( keep in mind that HTTPServlets are only one type of Servlet). In the world of Servlets the spec allowed you to either create a new Servlet for every client or to use one and make it thread safe. Every servlet container does it the second way and yet EJB only allows containers to do it the first way.
2. Performance - ??? What are they doing to improve performance. I can either call an object directly or go through layers of infrastructure - which do you think would be faster. Again only if we need the infrastructure is it an advantage (and NONE of the EJB infrastructure is to help with performance).
3. Maintainability - If I use OO programming methodology instead of the procedural based EJB I will be better off not worse off here. Why do people think that only EJB will get you modularity? Also testability is more difficult with EJB then POJOs and by decreasing testability I decress maintainability.
4. Different clients - Granted you need a server to handle the different clients but you don't need EJB for them to all call the same code. You just need the same object to call. Objects themselves don't care about who your client is. If I have some object Foo with method bar and that method is such that I can have copies of it in different app servers that are all the same ( a requirement for clustering) then all I have to do is have each client create a Foo and call foo.bar(). Why is it better to do the JNDI lookup to find the Foo (when they are all the same) and then use an RMI layer to call the bar. Even if we are calling the database here it is the conection pooling and the database that gives you your advantages - and there were connection pools long before there were app servers and you can use them in an AppServer even if you are a POJO.
5. Database access - One poster said if you use your JSP/Servlets to access the database all the time it will be slower because you don't get help from the container. This is a false dichotomy. I can still have an object layer and a data access layer and never have my JSP/Servlets directly make SQL calls. I don't need EJB for that and unless you are using Entity beans which means you have an extremely simple domain model, the container is doing nothing for you here.
History is important here. EJB arose out of a desire to make CORBA easier to deal with. The reason you would use CORBA is as an integration technology. You had a system (maybe an old batch system) that you wanted to access from an OO or other program. With a CORBA interface you could make it more object like to the client. When doing this properly there were some cross cutting concerns that crop up like Transaction management, Security etc that people designed frameworks to get around. EJB was supposed to help here. The problem is that the context - a wrapper for older technology or across system boundaries was lost and now people advocate using EJB when it is all one system, you don't distribute, and it is a brand new app. But why? I love JMS for integration but I don't think you should endlessly send messages to yourself within an application.
Most projects should have at most one or two EJBs but I see people create systems with hundreds of them. This is stupid and wasteful. You have made your build times longer, your deployments more complex, and your code harder to test. What would be better for our industry is for people to actually learn about OO Design and stop with trying to shove procedural technology in the way and calling that progress.
You use EJB when and only when you need the container services. That is, transaction, persistence and security. Now if you follow the advice of most and don't use Entity beans that leaves you with security and transaction. Very few people use the security features on EJB so that leaves you with transactions. There are many other often easier ways to deal with transactions though so it is still questionable if you ever need EJB.
Let us examine some of the comments made so far.
1. Scalability - Why is it more scalable? If you are using Stateless session beans you are scalable because you are stateless. But if you are stateless it is just as easy to use POJOs (Plain old Java Objects) . Stateless design leads to better scalability but EJBs are not necessary to make your application stateless. Again the only advantage is the container services provides - otherwise it is just code folks - and your code will work just fine.
While we are at it lets address another common misconception. Lifecycle management. It is often claimed that EJB gives you some necessary lifecycle management and object pooling. It also is supposed to help you in a multi threaded environment. The trouble with this claim is that if you are stateless there are no threading issues and you only need one instance to handle all of your clients on a server. Servlets and stateless Session beans are essentially equivalent ( keep in mind that HTTPServlets are only one type of Servlet). In the world of Servlets the spec allowed you to either create a new Servlet for every client or to use one and make it thread safe. Every servlet container does it the second way and yet EJB only allows containers to do it the first way.
2. Performance - ??? What are they doing to improve performance. I can either call an object directly or go through layers of infrastructure - which do you think would be faster. Again only if we need the infrastructure is it an advantage (and NONE of the EJB infrastructure is to help with performance).
3. Maintainability - If I use OO programming methodology instead of the procedural based EJB I will be better off not worse off here. Why do people think that only EJB will get you modularity? Also testability is more difficult with EJB then POJOs and by decreasing testability I decress maintainability.
4. Different clients - Granted you need a server to handle the different clients but you don't need EJB for them to all call the same code. You just need the same object to call. Objects themselves don't care about who your client is. If I have some object Foo with method bar and that method is such that I can have copies of it in different app servers that are all the same ( a requirement for clustering) then all I have to do is have each client create a Foo and call foo.bar(). Why is it better to do the JNDI lookup to find the Foo (when they are all the same) and then use an RMI layer to call the bar. Even if we are calling the database here it is the conection pooling and the database that gives you your advantages - and there were connection pools long before there were app servers and you can use them in an AppServer even if you are a POJO.
5. Database access - One poster said if you use your JSP/Servlets to access the database all the time it will be slower because you don't get help from the container. This is a false dichotomy. I can still have an object layer and a data access layer and never have my JSP/Servlets directly make SQL calls. I don't need EJB for that and unless you are using Entity beans which means you have an extremely simple domain model, the container is doing nothing for you here.
History is important here. EJB arose out of a desire to make CORBA easier to deal with. The reason you would use CORBA is as an integration technology. You had a system (maybe an old batch system) that you wanted to access from an OO or other program. With a CORBA interface you could make it more object like to the client. When doing this properly there were some cross cutting concerns that crop up like Transaction management, Security etc that people designed frameworks to get around. EJB was supposed to help here. The problem is that the context - a wrapper for older technology or across system boundaries was lost and now people advocate using EJB when it is all one system, you don't distribute, and it is a brand new app. But why? I love JMS for integration but I don't think you should endlessly send messages to yourself within an application.
Most projects should have at most one or two EJBs but I see people create systems with hundreds of them. This is stupid and wasteful. You have made your build times longer, your deployments more complex, and your code harder to test. What would be better for our industry is for people to actually learn about OO Design and stop with trying to shove procedural technology in the way and calling that progress.
Prepared by
D.Ramanjaneyulu
Department of
Information Technology
Top 10 Best Car Companies In The World 2013
Here is the list of top 10 best car companies in the world.
10. Audi
Headquartered in Zwickau, Audi is a German car distribution and manufacturing company founded by August Horch. It is the 10th best car company and is one of the most established automobile companies. It produces sports and luxury cars with extreme elegance.Audi A6 was named the most luxurious car,and it is fuel-efficient, reliable and affordable luxury car. Audi’s most liked and appreciated cars are Audi R8(my favourite), Audi A6 and Audi Q7. Audi A8 sedan Q7 was sold for $14 million which made it one of the most expensive cars.
9. Mercedes
Mercedes-Benz is the oldest automotive company in the world. It was founded in 1886 by Karl Benz. Mercedes-Benz is famous for its elegant luxury cars. It is a German company which serve all around the globe and sells automobile, buses, coaches and internal combustion engines. Some famous car models of Mercedes-Benz are E-Class, M-Class and GL-Class Mercedes-Benz. It produces sports, 4-door and luxury Coupé and sedan and MPVs.8. Ford
Ford is 8th best car company in the world. It was founded by Henry Ford in 1903. Its headquarters are in Dearborn, America. It is the first American automotive company featured in this top 10 list. Ford Motor Company sells a broad range of automobiles under the Ford marque worldwide, and it sells luxury cars under Lincoln and Aston Martin brand.7. Suzuki
Suzuki is a popular automotive corporation of Japan, headquartered in Hamamatsu, Japan. It is the ninth largest automobile-maker in the world by production. Suzuki sells and service a variety of products including automobiles, motorcycles, ATVs, marine engines and internal combustion engines. It is famous for its fuel-efficient and economy-priced cars.6. Hyundai
Hyundai Motor Company is a private Korean company founded in 1967. It is the second largest auto-manufacturer in Asia and the fourth largest automaker in the world after Toyota, GM and Volkswagen. Its produce and sells automobiles, engines and commercial vehicle worldwide.5. Nissan
Nissan ranked 5th on our list of top 10 best car companies of the world. It is a Japanese automobile manufacturer, headquartered in Yokohama, Japan and was founded in 1933. It serve worldwide, sells and produce automobiles. Nissan is sixth largest car manufacturer in the world. Nissan GTR and Nissan Skyline are two most liked cars manufactured by Nissan.4. BMW
BMW is one of the most famous and best car company in the world. It was founded in 1916 by Franz Joseph and is headquartered in Munich, Germany. It is famous for its sports and luxury cars. BMW also owns Mini and Rolls Royce, and it produce motorcycles as BMW Motorrad. Some famous products of BMW are BMW S1000RR, V12 LMR, M6 Coupe and Concept Gran Coupé .Honda is one of the world’s most famous automotive companies . It is the largest motorcycle manufacturer and seventh largest car manufacturing company in the world. Honda is a Japanese multinational company. It produce many products including automobile, motorcycle, jet engines, generator, jet aircraft and robotics. The title of the world’s largest internal combustion engine manufacturer also goes to Honda Motor Company, Ltd.
2. General Motors
General Motors is the second best car company in the world. It was founded in 1908 by William C. Durant. GM is the world’s second largest automobile company by global sales. It is headquartered in Detroit, United States and employs over 200K employs. The company serve in more than 150 countries.1. Toyota
Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese car manufacturer founded in 1937 by Kiichiro Toyoda. It serves automobiles worldwide and employs more than 300K people around the world. Its headquarters are located in Toyota, Aichi, a city of Japan.The company is world’s third largest car company. Toyota is the world’s eleventh largest company by revenue with its revenue being ¥18.5 trillion. It has manufactured hundreds of models of hybrid, sports, classic, electric, SUVs and luxury cars.
Among them which is your favourite car brand? My favourites are Audi and Honda.
30, మార్చి 2013, శనివారం
Baggage Allowance CalculatorPER KG 250 Rs FOR LOCAL TRAVELLER U HAVE TO PAY
Please select the Baggage Category |
Allowances vary depending on cabin and
JetPrivilege membership tier. Please enter your information below to see
the allowances for Jet Airways operated flights. Please note that any
additional baggage allowances for the JetPrivilege members shown here
are not available on ATR flights. Also these additional allowances are
not displayed on your ticket.
With effect from October 1, 2011, if separate
tickets are issued for routes within India with international
connections, the baggage allowance shown on the domestic ticket will
apply to routes within India on Jet Airways and JetKonnect flights.
For tickets issued on or after June 1, 2012, our
baggage policies for flights operated by Jet Airways on select routes
which includes Belgium and North America have changed.
Note: For our JetPrivilege Platinum / Gold
/ Silver members who are also co-brand credit card members, only the
higher of the two allowances will apply.
For example: If a JetPrivilege Platinum member is also a co-brand credit card holder, he / she will be entitled to only 20 kgs of additional baggage allowance and not 30kgs.
For example: If a JetPrivilege Platinum member is also a co-brand credit card holder, he / she will be entitled to only 20 kgs of additional baggage allowance and not 30kgs.
For baggage information on partner airlines, click here
*Indicates Mandatory Fields
Origin:* |
|
||
Destination:* |
|
||
Cabin:* |
|||
|
|
Flight Summary |
Origin: | Mumbai (BOM) | Cabin: | Economy |
Destination: | Hyderabad (HYD) |
|
Free Baggage Allowance |
Standard
20kgs
Silver
30kgs
Gold
35kgs
Platinum
40kgs
Infant
0
Standard
20kgs
Silver
30kgs
Gold
35kgs
Platinum
40kgs
Infant
0
|
Excess Baggage Charges |
Oversized
INR 1000 per check-in baggage / items exceeding 158 linear cms
Excess Baggage
INR 250/ kg
|
Cabin Baggage Dimensions |
The
Government of India regulations permit only one piece of cabin baggage
on board. The cabin baggage may not weigh more than 7 kgs.

Trolley bags with the above specified dimensions will be allowed.
Guests travelling on flights originating from Jammu, Srinagar and Leh stations will not be allowed to carry any hand baggage.
For any other details and regulations pertaining to cabin baggage, please click here.
Trolley bags with the above specified dimensions will be allowed.
Guests travelling on flights originating from Jammu, Srinagar and Leh stations will not be allowed to carry any hand baggage.
For any other details and regulations pertaining to cabin baggage, please click here.
దీనికి సబ్స్క్రయిబ్ చేయి:
పోస్ట్లు (Atom)